What is the difference between a valid agreement and a strong agreement?
The definition of a valid argument is something that is always correct and there are no fallacies at in the inference or arrive at some conclusion. If the argument or statement is true then it would be unattainable for the conclusion for it to be false. Also, a valid argument cannot have true assumption and a false conclusion.
The definition of a strong argument is when you assume something is always true. It is important when have a strong argument that the facts you are talking about are concrete and factual. To have a strong argument the conclusion should always be correct.
Example of Valid argument: Red, Yellow and blue are always classified as primary colors. There is never any confusion on whether they can or can’t be primary colors. They are always primary colors.
Example of a strong argument: After students graduate from high school they must go to college. Most people think that to get further along in life you must get a college diploma, that is why most people assume is true to get a college degree.
Your definitions are clear and understanding. You stretch your definitions on both valid and strong argument (don't worry! it's a good thing!)
ReplyDeleteBoth of your examples are great! They both make good example for a clear understanding. For your valid argument, it is true that those colors will always be primary colors. I love your example for your strong argument. I like how it connect to me (as well with other student I assume) at one point before and while attending college. Even though I understand your examples, maybe add why they make a valid or strong argument.